Update to the Corrupticourts- From Attorney Jim Brewer

2006-05-05 07:09:57 PM
Quote
From the "bagged" attorney Jim Brewer. Here's what happened to him:
actionlyme.org/WHO_BAGGED_BREWER.htm
By Rich Murzin, former Hartford Police Detective
========
ON THE CORRUPTICOURTS:
==
From: "JS BREWER" [email address snipped]
To: melissa.farley@po.state.ct.us
CC: [other recipients snipped]
Subject: Who gets to bring Note pads in Court
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 20:02:49 -0400
Dear Ms. Farley:
I am writing to inquire what the Judicial Department's position is on
bringing in note taking materials to our various Courts. I have
practiced in many courtrooms, both state and federal and in New Jersey
as well, and I was perplexed to hear that Judge Susco has no issued
(apparently) an order that, "You can't take notes here [in the
courtroom]."
I understand that the COURT ORDER was directed at reporters, which
raises considerable First Amendment issues for me. I expect the
reporters from the papers I read to be able to "note" what is
occurring in our courtrooms. As you know they are the "eyes and
ears" for the public. We have a right to know what happens.
Needless to say, the judiciary's track record the past few months has
been disappointing to say the least. Opinions held back by the Chief
Justice to help a fellow Justice get promoted. Denial of FOI status to
what anyone who isn't smoking dope would agree are administrative
records, and now denial of the press and apparently anyone from taking
notes in a courtroom. Wow! Some times I feel as though some time warp
has occurred and we have reverted back to the cold war, lost it to the
"Evil Empire" Soviet Union and our Constitution thereafter scraped
for some "New World Order" called Corrupticut Law.
I wonder if the Court's order was enforced up Prosecutors, and other
government agents in the same manner as others.
Finally, if I were to go to one of your Courtrooms tomorrow and start
taking notes, will I be in contempt of court?
The fact that you and your cohorts at the judiciary have not come out
and immediately disavowed this outrageous and draconian order speaks
volumes about the extent of corruption in Connecticut, "the land of
steady habits" needs to be renamed "the land that eviscerated the
Constitution."
Please let me know as soon as possible, because I want to be able to go
tomorrow and take some notes!
Sincerely,
Jim Brewer
-